The Case Against
Tyler Higbee:
*Non-Existent Through
3 Years
*Snap Share Going
Forward?
*Route Share Going
Forward?
*5-Game Stretch in
’19 = Fluky
*Valued Blocker
*Target Competition
The case against Tyler Higbee is not
an indictment of Tyler Higbee’s talent – let’s make that clear.
The case against
Tyler Higbee is built on all of the other underlying factors working against
him.
& there are
quite a few factors…
X Unproductive Through
3 Years
Simply put, Tyler Higbee was non-existent
from a fantasy perspective through his first 3 1/2 years with the Rams. Through
3 seasons, he never cleared:
25 REC’s
25 REC’s
295 YD’s
or 2 TD’S
Through 59 career
games, he’d yet to have a single 100-yard game.
& he had just 4
total TD’s…
For fantasy, he
wasn’t just below-average – he was completely useless, despite how “talented”
he may have been.
Here’s a look
back:
Higbee was drafted by Les Snead &
Jeff Fisher. As a rookie, in 2016, he played behind Lance Kendricks.
Kendricks played
82.3% of the snaps & caught 50/499/2
Higbee played
40.1% of the snaps & caught 11/85/1
Kendricks left at
the end of 2016… but…
Gerald Everett
scorched the combine that offseason with a 4.62 40/37.5” vertical/22 bench rep
split, so Les Snead & first-year head coach Sean McVay decided to draft him
in RD2 (44th overall) a year after Snead & Jeff Fisher took Higbee
in RD4.
In that second year for Higbee, 2017, his
snap share rose from his rookie year & he significantly out-snapped rookie
Gerald Everett.
But he hardly
out-produced him.
Higbee played on 70.5%
of the snaps & caught 25/295/1
Everett played on 28.8%
of the snaps & caught 16/244/2
In 2018 – Higbee’s third year &
Everett’s second – Higbee’s snap share & production stayed almost exactly
the same as it was the year before.
On the other hand,
Everett saw both his snap share & production significantly rise.
Higbee played on
71.6% of the snaps & caught 24/292/2
Everett played on
34.5% of the snaps & caught 33/320/3
The Rams then
surprisingly signed Tyler Higbee to a 4-year extension, despite his lack of really
any receiving production through 3 years.
What does that
mean?
It means the Rams
valued his ability to provide value in another way – as a blocker.
Last year, in 2019, who can forget?
It was Higbee’s fourth year & Everett’s third & the Rams continued to deploy (an already extended) Higbee in a blocking role – the one they paid him handsomely to occupy, while Everett continued to see increased involvement in the passing game.
It was Higbee’s fourth year & Everett’s third & the Rams continued to deploy (an already extended) Higbee in a blocking role – the one they paid him handsomely to occupy, while Everett continued to see increased involvement in the passing game.
Everett even
started to eat into Higbee’s snap share.
The snap % split to start last season looked like this:
Higbee - Everett
52 - 39
52 - 39
34 - 71 (Higbee
hurt)
OUT - 88
45 - 57
56 - 81
57 - 53
64 - 74
55 - 48
BYE
32 - 70
45 - 57
56 - 81
57 - 53
64 - 74
55 - 48
BYE
32 - 70
76 - 25
70 - 31 (Everett hurt)
70 - 31 (Everett hurt)
Through those
first 11 weeks of 2019:
Higbee caught –
21/192/1 (16-game pace of 30/279/2)
Everett caught –
35/385/2 (16-game pace of 50/560/3)
Higbee was being
used the same way he had been used in his first 3 years – as a blocker.
Everett was being
used as the preferred receiving option.
Just look at the route
charts.
Higbee = Blocker
Everett = Receiver
Then, Everett banged up his knee in
Week 12 & Higbee went on a crazy 5-game stretch while soaking up nearly
100% of the snaps & essentially all of Everett’s routes. Higbee’s snap % in
those last 5 games was:
91
97
86
89
96
Higbee’s route chart during those 5
weeks literally looks like if you combined his & Everett’s route charts
from the first-half of the year. He was able to run all of his own routes +
Everett’s while letting Johnny Mundt take over his blocking responsibilities.
Higbee went for 43/522/2 over those
last 5 games – absolutely glorious. But a deeper look reveals that maybe that
production is not quite as glorious as we’d like to believe…
Higbee faced AZ
twice, SEA, DAL, & SF.
The Cardinals –
who Higbee faced twice – were BY FAR the easiest fantasy matchup for TE’s last
year. They allowed 317.8 fantasy points to TE’s on the year – more than 65
fantasy points more than the second-most points allowed to TE’s, who coincidentally,
happened to be the Seattle Seahawks.
Can you guess who
was the 3rd easiest fantasy matchup for TE’s?
You can’t even
make this shit up – it was the Dallas Cowboys.
SF was a lot
stingier with the 6th fewest amount of points allowed to TE’s on the
year & you definitely have to give Higbee credit for going 9/104 against
them.
But it’s important
to understand that this wasn’t just a matter of talent shining through – it was
a matter of talent + 86-97% snap share + full route usage + ridiculously TE-friendly
schedule.
It’s quite
possible that Higbee’s actually just a good player who excelled in the most
ideal scenario imaginable & not the next Travis Kelce…
The asking price for Higbee this year
would make the gamble worth it – if we could realistically project Higbee
keeping his near-100% snap share, full route-tree, and ability to let another
TE do the blocking in 2020.
The problem is,
there’s literally only one piece of evidence to suggest that Higbee keeps that
near-100% snap share, full route tree, and ability to let another TE do the
blocking – Johnny Mundt playing over Gerald Everett when Everett returned from
injury for the last 2 games of last season.
The main pitch for
Higbee is built on the idea that he permanently stole Gerald Everett’s role as
the primary receiving TE & that the team would rather rely on Johnny Mundt
as a blocker in 2TE sets than to put Everett on the field.
Yet, that argument
is so easily dismissed.
If Gerald Everett was healthy Weeks 16 & 17 & didn’t play because Higbee had permanently taken his receiving role & Mundt had permanently settled into Higbee’s old blocking role, why hasn’t Everett been traded, like, yesterday?
If you’re the
Rams, what justification is there for not trading Everett if you’re plan is to
just let him rot behind Johnny Mundt & leave for nothing as a FA at the end
of the year?
If you’re not
going to use him, wouldn’t you seek compensation (which someone would
definitely give them) for a 2nd RD TE with 4.62 wheels who has
played capably through 3 years???
It’s almost as if
they plan to use Everett in 2TE sets, run his 4.62 wheels off the wagon in the
last year of his contract, & then let him walk at the end of the year with
his replacement Brycen Hopkins already on the team.
Gerald Everett not being traded can
only mean one thing – the Rams are planning on using him, or they’d get
compensation from someone else who would want to.
Everett is not
going to rot away on the pine while Johnny Mundt blocks & Tyler Higbee runs
all of Everett’s old routes & gets all of Everett’s old snaps. There’s just
no logical scenario where that happens.
2TE sets = Higbee
& Everett, not Higbee & Mundt
When that happens,
Gerald Everett is going to take back some of those routes you can see on the late-season
route-charts that Higbee soaked up – and he’s going to take back a lot more of
them then the 5 targets Mundt compiled over the last 5 games.
We cannot expect
Higbee to out-target the TE2 by a ratio of 56-5 if that TE2 is Gerald Everett
& not Johnny Mundt. It’s just not logical.
That means that
all of that TE production you saw from Higbee over the last 5 weeks is going to
be split with Everett going forward (& then probably with Brycen Hopkins
when Everett leaves).
Whether the
production split is 70/30 Higbee, 60/40, 50/50, or 60/40 Everett, who really
knows?
But as long as
Everett is on this team, he’s the TE2.
When Higbee & Everett are both on
the field in 2TE sets & the play calls for one to block, Higbee is
definitely going back to the blocking role – the one they paid him handsomely
to occupy.
I mean seriously,
if you’re the Rams, who are you going to ask to block?
The guy who’s 6’6”/255 (who you paid to block), or the guy who’s 6’3”/240 & runs a 4.62?
The guy who’s 6’6”/255 (who you paid to block), or the guy who’s 6’3”/240 & runs a 4.62?
Have I said 4.62
40 enough times yet?
Now, it’s certainly possible that
Higbee steals work in 1TE sets that would have otherwise gone to Everett
before. He likely will & that’ll help him be better than he was in the role
we saw him in through 3 1/2 years. But Everett is too good himself to not steal
at least 10-15% of the work in 1TE sets, at the very bare minimum – and there
will be plenty of 3WR/1TE sets run with the Rams having invested a 2nd
round pick in Van Jefferson as their WR3 (& potentially even Josh Reynolds
seeing playing time).
That just doesn’t
really leave any way for Higbee to see that 86-97% snap share he saw in the
last 5 weeks of 2019.
It is possible that the Rams decide to
run more plays with 2TE’s on the field where both TE’s run routes. Higbee seems
to have earned that.
However, there are
question marks about a Rams offensive line who’s best player is 38 year old
Andrew Whitworth…
Will they be able to afford to send both TE’s on pass routes & consistently rely on the RB’s to block?
Will they be able to afford to send both TE’s on pass routes & consistently rely on the RB’s to block?
Higbee is a great
blocker, we know that by the fact they paid him for it, but Todd Gurley (who
had a 70.6 PFF pass-blocking grade last year) is gone…
He’s replaced by Cam
Akers – a rookie, who graded 99th out of 349 FBS qualifiers in
pass-blocking according to Rotoworld (good not great), & Darrell Henderson
– who was among the worst graded pass-blockers with a 46.1 PFF grade.
Who do you think
they’re going to trust with blocking assignments?
Them, or Higbee?
Not only are Akers & Henderson uninspiring
pass-blockers, but they are actually decent weapons in the receiving game &
there’s a possibility they steal more targets than the 55 combined targets Gurley
& Henderson had last year. Malcolm Brown could steal some too. Another
unknown.
On top of the possibility
of three RB’s stealing routes & targets & the near-certainty of Everett
stealing snaps, routes, & targets, this team has two really good WR’s &
potentially a third, and that’s not even factoring Brycen Hopkins into the
equation…
Even if the Rams
do turn into a 2TE offense, how many offenses can you think of with WR’s like
Cooper Kupp & Robert Woods that were also able to support 2 TE’s? To the
point where one of the TE’s finished in the top-8?
There’s certainly upside in a potent
passing offense, but there’s also a ton of uncertainty surrounding:
- the amount Higbee’s schedule affected his performance last year
- whether he’s going to be forced to revert back to a blocking role in some situations & not let that responsibility fall on another TE
- whether he’s going to see a full snap count
- and how much production will be left with Cooper Kupp, Robert Woods, Gerald Everett, Van Jefferson, & the RB’s getting theirs.
- the amount Higbee’s schedule affected his performance last year
- whether he’s going to be forced to revert back to a blocking role in some situations & not let that responsibility fall on another TE
- whether he’s going to see a full snap count
- and how much production will be left with Cooper Kupp, Robert Woods, Gerald Everett, Van Jefferson, & the RB’s getting theirs.
At this point, I won’t even try to
persuade anyone away from investing in Higbee as their starter. How could I do
that after the production he put up in 5 games last year? If you wanna gamble
on the upside, go for it.
Just know that
there are major risks here & you do not want to get caught holding the bag
at TE.
If you’re going to
draft him as your starter, I would strongly urge you to also invest another
pick (or even two) in a possible breakout TE who: is a plus-athlete, doesn’t
have as many roadblocks to a full snap count & full route tree, and has less
overall target competition.
Some guys who fit
the bill (who I’d take over Higbee in both redraft & dynasty) are:
Hayden Hurst
Jonnu Smith
Jonnu Smith
Dallas Goedert
& Chris
Herndon
If you risk it for
the biscuit on Higbee, you really ought to add one or two of these other guys
as insurance. All of them offer more clearly checked boxes for: athleticism,
route utilization, and target competition.